The land of immigrants is against immigration.
Some people are saying Syrian refugees are no different than the Jewish refugees of 1938.
Histopinion tweeted these statistics, showing how Americans felt about Jewish refugees.
Is there really a comparison from then to now? Most Americans were apposed to Jewish refugees and currently the majority of Americans are against Syrian refugees.
The only fair thing to do is look at the arguments from 1938 and now, to see if they really compare.
In 1939 Americans were mostly concerned with economics, after all, they were in the middle of the great depression, and soon to be involved in WWII.
According to the Nov. 5, 1938 edition of The New York Times. Senator Gerald P. Nye of North Dakota said, “Our conditions here at home prohibit accepting an influx of population.”
They were concerned that the Jewish refugees would take their jobs.
Americans are currently worried about the state of the economy. Americans are struggling to find jobs and some argue Syrian refugees will take jobs away from Americans.
Disguised Nazi spies was a concern, as Jewish refugees immigrated to the U.S. in 1938. Americans were concerned that Jews would also bring with them their communistic views.
Americans currently argue that refugees coming from Syria will also bring with them their ideology and Shari’a Law and disregard the Constitution of the United States.
Similarities certainly cannot be denied. But one should examine the differences.
Americans in 1938 were not afraid of the Jews coming over and planning to kill random Americans in the name of God.
Americans today are concerned that ISIS is disguising themselves as refugees and designing plans to carryout mass killings.
This fear is derived from a recent ISIS attack in Paris, and goes back to 9/11, when two planes were highjacked and crashed into the World Trade Centers, a third plane crashed into the Pentagon and a fourth plane into a field in Pennsylvania.
Should the land of immigrants be against immigrations? You decide.
Recent Comments